Inconsistent Explanations

Two different individuals seeking information regarding the "certified Arborist" at the Cutter's Creek development received inconsistent information from the City of South Euclid.

Why are City officials avoiding these questions and concocting answers to fit their desired scenario?

• First- the City responds that the Arborist report can only be obtained by contacting the Developer.
• Next- City officials state that the Developer is "on notice" regarding the Arborist report.
• Finally- the City claims that an Arborist is not required until after the construction is completed.

Please review the entire text of the Resolution that granted a Conditional Use Permit to build the Cutter's Creek development:

• Cutter's Creek: Enforcement Issues

On the website for South Euclid that contains "approved" minutes from City Council meetings, we find it cagey that the public comments from the meeting on July 23, 2007 have been conveniently omitted.

• http://www.cityofsoutheuclid.com/images/CouncilAgenda7-23-07.pdf

Please click on each individual image to view full-size document. Use your "back arrow" to return to the origonal post.