Please click on image to view full size.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE SOUTH EUCLID CITY GOVERNMENT?
Search This Blog
Use the SEARCH BOX above to explore South Euclid Oversight.
- OR -
Utilize the INDEX BY SUBJECT located on this page. (below, right)
- OR -
Access the BLOG ARCHIVE at the bottom of this page to view all previous
SEOversight posts in chronological order.
~~TO VIEW DOCUMENTS ON SEOVERSIGHT~~
Please RIGHT CLICK on DOCUMENT then LEFT CLICK on "OPEN LINK".
THANK YOU FOR READING SOUTH EUCLID OVERSIGHT.
- OR -
Utilize the INDEX BY SUBJECT located on this page. (below, right)
- OR -
Access the BLOG ARCHIVE at the bottom of this page to view all previous
SEOversight posts in chronological order.
~~TO VIEW DOCUMENTS ON SEOVERSIGHT~~
Please RIGHT CLICK on DOCUMENT then LEFT CLICK on "OPEN LINK".
THANK YOU FOR READING SOUTH EUCLID OVERSIGHT.
DONT BE FOOLED BY THE THREAT OF SAFETY FORCE LAYOFFS WHILE THE ADMINISTRATION INCREASES IN SIZE AND SALARIES. PLEASE CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING LINK FOR INFORMATION ON THE LAND AQUISITION TAX SCHEME, ALSO KNOWN AS ISSUE 65 - SAFETY LEVY:
PLEASE CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING LINK TO VIEW 2015 TOTAL COMPENSATION PACKAGE FOR ALL CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID EMPLOYEES.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CLICK ON IMAGE BELOW FOR CEDAR CENTER REPAYMENT SCHEDULE
~~~HOME~~~
INFORMATION
~~INDEX BY SUBJECT~~
- BUDGET AND SALARIES
- CAMPAIGN FINANCE
- CAMPAIGN TRAIL
- CEDAR CENTER & STANHOPE ROAD
- CITIZENS AT THE MICROPHONE
- CITY SERVICES
- COUNTY CONNECTIONS
- CUTTER'S CREEK
- FEES AND FINES
- GREENVALE 9
- LEGAL MATTERS
- LETTERS
- MISCELLANEOUS
- MUST SEE POSTS
- OAKWOOD
- PERSONNEL
- PLAYGROUND OF POSSIBILITIES
- POINT-OF-SALE
- POLICE
- REAL ESTATE
- SAFETY LEVY - ISSUE 65
- TAX CREDIT ROLLBACK
- TRAFFIC CAMERAS
- YEAR IN REVIEW
COMMENTS
Visitor Counter
YOUR COMMENTS ARE WELCOME AND ENCOURAGED! ** NEW INFORMATION IS FREQUENTLY POSTED **
You can elect to have your comments and identity remain completely anonymous. Please feel free to address any issue.
Simply click on the words "Post a Comment" or "comments" under any specific posting. If you would like to read the comments that others have made – click on the "title" of the particular "post" that appears as a "headline". All the comments for that post will appear in an easy-to-read format. Then, use your "back" arrow to return to the main blog.
Remember – if you decide to make a comment, your identity will remain completely anonymous, even to those at South Euclid Oversight, if you so desire. Simply select the "anonymous" option when submitting your comment. Your comment is delivered to SEO via a no-reply message from "Google". Your email identity and address are not revealed to those at SEO. If you wish to make direct email contact with SEO, here is the address: seoversight@sbcglobal.net
Please be advised that all comments are moderated to prevent any vulgar or inappropriate statements.
Thank you for your continual interest and participation!
Simply click on the words "Post a Comment" or "comments" under any specific posting. If you would like to read the comments that others have made – click on the "title" of the particular "post" that appears as a "headline". All the comments for that post will appear in an easy-to-read format. Then, use your "back" arrow to return to the main blog.
Remember – if you decide to make a comment, your identity will remain completely anonymous, even to those at South Euclid Oversight, if you so desire. Simply select the "anonymous" option when submitting your comment. Your comment is delivered to SEO via a no-reply message from "Google". Your email identity and address are not revealed to those at SEO. If you wish to make direct email contact with SEO, here is the address: seoversight@sbcglobal.net
Please be advised that all comments are moderated to prevent any vulgar or inappropriate statements.
Thank you for your continual interest and participation!
1 comment:
In fairness to the city on this one, if South Euclid had spent $250,000 on a records retention system I can imagine that SEO would have simply changed this headline from "Housing Records Destroyed" to "Reckless spending to retain old documents".
I don't know what SEO is trying to say by posting this article: that the city destroys documents it has no storage facility for? That the city is short on cash and cannot afford offsite storage for documents? That the city was too cheap to implement some form of retention system? That the city was prudent by NOT spending the money on a retention system?
If you've got a point to make, SEO, state it. Otherwise this just looks like a cheap shot. There's plenty of things to rail against the city for, but unfortunately this document destruction post simply reinforces the need for the city to SPEND MONEY on a retention system. If you're arguing that the city misallocates funding, then state so.
Post a Comment