Hubris Personified

Please click on image to view full size.

For 3 cities to consider such a costly endeavor without putting the matter up for a vote is a complete travesty. Offering up the option for the public to phone in their vote—ala reality TV— pertaining to a grant, which would only yield a minute portion of the overall price tag of this complex, is a sad substitute for an actual ballot issue.

Lyndhurst appears to be the only rational thinking group of people who are determined not be swept away with this mirage. This was a foolhardy proposal three years ago and makes even less economic sense today.

As for this administration and council’s track record on extracurricular financial activities outside basic services, their performance is well below stellar.

Cedar Center is currently sitting in development purgatory while the tax payer tally swells to colossal proportions. Meanwhile, the private portion of this equation appears tentative.

City Hall has yet to provide a full accounting for the Playground of Possibilities. In fact, when challenged with the knowledge of the city service department working on the clock, Mayor Welo chose to step out of the realm of reality and tell outright lies. Please see: A Perpetually Changing Story

Let’s not forget the “Greenvale 9.” City officials took it upon themselves to borrow $1.8 million to purchase nine brick dwellings and promptly demolish them with no plans to recoup or repay the money.

If “past is prologue,” who among us are ready to put their faith in South Euclid city official’s participation in such a grand undertaking?

The following links are for the "Fund for Our Economic Future's EfficientGovNow" program:

• http://www.efficientgovnow.org/Proposals/abstractK.html

• http://www.efficientgovnow.org/FileUploads/Proposals/Knewproposal.pdf

• http://efficientgovnow.org/

South Euclid-Lyndhurst Recreation Commission: REGULAR AUDIT - For the year ended June 30, 2008:

• http://www.auditor.state.oh.us/AuditSearch/Reports/2009/South_Euclid_Lyndhurst_Recreation_Commission_08_07-Cuyahoga.pdf

Only In School Zones?

Attempting to peddle this scheme as anything other than scraping and clawing for cash is an insult. This is just another way for City Hall to wage war against the citizenry to help pay for their willy-nilly spending spree.
Note the company soliciting the city refers to their product as “Speed and Red Light Photo Enforcement.” City officials present the idea and the intent to the public as “Safety Cameras.”

• time: 2 min. 25 sec.

Please click on articles below to view full size.



<><><> LINKS TO RELATED POSTS <><><>

• Cash Grab
• Traffic Enforcement: Man vs Machine
• Cash Grab Update
• Traffic Enforcement Cameras: Coming Soon
• Inadequately Advertised "Public Hearing"
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

A Perpetually Changing Story

The expiration date on the fantasy floated by both South Euclid officials as well as the Sun Messenger concerning this playground has long since expired.
The idea of a fully accessible playground, financed with 100% donations, without using taxpayer dollars, built exclusively by community volunteers, and maintained through continued fundraising, is indeed a noble concept. Unfortunately that's not how it happened. This isn't an attack on the volunteers who did turn out, nor on the city service workers who were simply doing their jobs. It's about being honest and fair with the taxpayers. And that isn't happening either.

Even after the jig was up and the service department was brought in to finish the job, city officials—both from the Administration and Council indignantly stick to the same storyline, even while being filmed. What is most perplexing is why on earth the Sun Messenger would mollify the truth in order to alleviate the consequences for City Hall? Why after every detail communicated to the public continued to be drastically modified, did the local newspaper not change course and begin to hold City Hall’s feet to the fire?

Considering the dismal performance demonstrated by both the leaders of South Euclid, and those with the "power of the press," one can only hope that this playground debacle doesn’t turn out to be the precursor to the redevelopment of Cedar Center.

SEO has done everything feasible to shed as much light on this issue as possible and would welcome anyone who so chooses, to give us any thoughts they feel are germane.
Which, if any, of the wildly varied numbers reported by City Hall and the Sun Messenger are accurate?

Donations

• $80,000 : 6-4-09 * document A
• $59,328.51 : 2-16-09 * document C
• 250 “pickets” sold : 10-2-08 * document D
• $60,000 : 8-7-08 * document E
• $125,000 : 7-14-08 * video 1
• “close to reaching half our goal” : 9-8-08 * video 2

Cost of Playground

• $150,000 : 6-4-09 * document A
• $255,296.34 : 2-16-09 * document C
• $200,000 : 8-7-08 * document E

Number of Volunteers

• 1500 : 6-4-09 * document A
• 1000 : 10-2-08 * document D
• "over 700" : 10-1-08 * video 3

Please click on each document below to view full size.
Document -A-
Date: June 4, 2009

• $80,000 in donations received to date
• Total cost of playground = $150,000
• 1500 volunteers participated
• Mayor denies service department involvement during business hours

The entire concept of the playground was presented to the public as a community effort, including all donated funds and volunteers to build it. However, the Mayor is quoted in the Sun Messenger, “We can’t have volunteers working here because of liability.”

Document -B-
Date: March 22, 2009

• City officials are unwilling to provide full financial disclosure
• There was never a response to this request for public records

Document -C-
Date: February 16, 2009

• $59,328.51 in donations received to date
• City loaned the playground project $175,235.34
• Total cost to date = $200,296.34 + estimated cost of ground cover at $55,000 for a to date cost of $255,296.34

Ordinance 31-08 sponsored by Mayor Welo in July, 2008, provided for an amount “not to exceed $150,000” to be loaned to the playground project. See additional details previously posted on SEO; Financial Discrepancies - On 2-16-09 the Mayor states that $175,235.34 was loaned to the playground project. Where did the extra $25,235.24 come from? It is currently unknown how and when that authorization took place.



Document -D-
Date: October 2, 2008

• Donations include the sale of 250 pickets
• $55,000-$80,000 cost for rubber ground cover
• 1000 volunteers participated

City officials boast to the Sun Messenger of a record turnout for a single day being “over 100” people. Yet in the very same article, it is reported that 1,000 volunteers assembled over the course of the 8 day build. It appears that someone’s math is incorrect.

Document -E-
Date: August 7, 2008

• $60,000 in donations pledged to date -including- $50,000 Verizon commitment not yet received
• Total cost = $200,000
• $14,000 paid by city to the architectural firm, Leathers and Associates, to coordinate the project

The videos below are presented in chronological order. In this instance, each video is identified by an assigned number for reference purposes.
Video -1-

• time: 2 min. 41 sec.

Date: July 14, 2008

• $125,000 in donations pledged to date
• Mayor Welo presents Ordinance 31-08 with an explanation that the $150,000 about to be loaned to the playground project INCLUDES the cost of the ground cover. It was later reported by city officials that there was no money available to purchase the ground cover: see Video 3.

Also see previous post: Mixed Messages

Video -2-

• time: 1 min. 14 sec.

Date: September 8, 2008

• Donations received to date = "close to reaching half our goal" (2 weeks prior to the build date)

Please see previous post: Trifecta Of Panic

Video -3-

• time: 3 min. 03 sec.

Date: October 1, 2008

• Cost of ground cover = $70,000; funds not available
• "Probably over 700" volunteers participated

Video -4-

• time: 3 min. 19 sec.

Date: April 13, 2009

• It is alleged that although city officials have presented the playground to the public as fully funded and constructed exclusively by donations and volunteered time, tools and supplies- all with no public money- indeed that is NOT the case. City officials steadfastly contend that the playground was built by all volunteers and that NO city workers were there on city time. Council President Moe Romeo specifically states that no city workers were paid to work there. Video 5 clearly shows city workers shoveling gravel at the playground for the base.

Video -5-

• time: 3 min. 10 sec.

Date: April 23, 2009

• City workers on the clock shovel gravel for the base of the rubber ground cover which is being poured by a contracted company.

• A representative from the company contracted to pour the rubber ground cover has an unsolicited conversation with SEO. Workers from his company and city service department workers shoveled gravel for the playground base in preparation for the rubber pour. He can be heard explaining that “this isn’t what we do. This is usually completely done.” His account was that the volunteers needed the previous weekend did not show up. He also states that they required special authorization to utilize city workers to complete the project on April 22nd and 23rd. It is not currently known how many additional days the city service workers were tasked to work at the playground, or, how much additional money was paid to the contractor for “back charges” due to the city’s lack of preparedness.

Video -6-

• time: 2 min. 10 sec.

Date: April 27, 2009

• Mayor states that the service department worked on playground "one day" doing drainage and flood control

Please click on the aerial photograph below of Bexley Park and the Playground of Possibilities circled in yellow. Note the area to the east of the playground is the outfield for the ball diamond. There was no drainage work taking place in that area as the Mayor claimed.

• Financial Discrepancies : August 08, 2008

• Trifecta Of Panic : September 06, 2008

• Playground Update : September 09, 2008

• You WILL Be Donating : January 10, 2009

• Two Different Stories : April 26, 2009

• On The Defensive : April 29, 2009