Search This Blog

Use the SEARCH BOX above to explore South Euclid Oversight.
- OR -
Utilize the INDEX BY SUBJECT located on this page. (below, right)
- OR -
Access the BLOG ARCHIVE at the bottom of this page to view all previous
SEOversight posts in chronological order.



~~TO VIEW DOCUMENTS ON SEOVERSIGHT~~
Please RIGHT CLICK on DOCUMENT then LEFT CLICK on "OPEN LINK".



THANK YOU FOR READING SOUTH EUCLID OVERSIGHT.

DONT BE FOOLED BY THE THREAT OF SAFETY FORCE LAYOFFS WHILE THE ADMINISTRATION INCREASES IN SIZE AND SALARIES. PLEASE CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING LINK FOR INFORMATION ON THE LAND AQUISITION TAX SCHEME, ALSO KNOWN AS ISSUE 65 - SAFETY LEVY:

PLEASE CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING LINK TO VIEW 2015 TOTAL COMPENSATION PACKAGE FOR ALL CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID EMPLOYEES.





Sunday, February 28, 2010

Back With A Vengeance


In November 2008, voters in South Euclid decided there would be NO Point-of-Sale exterior inspections by a hefty 6,282 to 4,061 result. Now city officials are not only brazenly ignoring that decision - this time they’ve added interior inspections into the legislation.

A few observations as they appear from this vantage point:
  • If someone has lost the ability to pay for their home and it is going to be abandoned, it seems unlikely that anyone would stop off at city hall on their way out of town to register that house and pay the fee.
  • When the discussion of these homes comes up Housing Manager, Sally Martin offers demolition as the first solution.
  • By trying to seize such tight control of housing in South Euclid, city officials are attempting to manipulate the free market.
  • Is it legal for City Council to try and pass previous legislation that was denied by a vote of the people by giving it a new ordinance number?

The following video is a MUST see......

  • time: 6 min. 51 sec.



ORDINANCE: 11-10



Click here for further examples of
questionable credibility  and

taxation with misrepresentation


Please also see previous SEO post Temporary Stay Of Execution.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

If I am not mistaken, wasn't the proposed language altered last week in order to target this at foreclosed properties, not normal sales?

If that's the case, what's the problem?

Anonymous said...

As stated in the Sun Messenger they went back to the "drawing board" because some residents took the initiative to to NOT have it rammed down their throats as it was initially written. The current administration and friends needs to be watched very closely. In general the residents best interest will be served by their direct participation and oversight not by their elected council. If the city want to go in and make sure the utilities are properly turned off then have the fire dept. handle it at no charge for crying out load. Owner approval would be sought first and asked to show in lieu of uninvited entry. If after one year nothing changes then start up the yearly house-sitting fee of XXX dollars. But Nooooooooo, they gotta turn it into a federal case and squeeeeze people even more then they already do. Give 'em an inch..., ehh?

Blog Archive