WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE
SOUTH EUCLID CITY GOVERNMENT?
Search This Blog
Use the SEARCHBOX above to explore South Euclid Oversight. - OR - Utilize the INDEX BY SUBJECT located on this page. (below, right) - OR - Access the BLOG ARCHIVE at the bottom of this page to view all previous SEOversight posts in chronological order.
~~TO VIEW DOCUMENTS ON SEOVERSIGHT~~ PleaseRIGHTCLICKonDOCUMENTthenLEFTCLICKon"OPENLINK".
THANK YOU FOR READING SOUTH EUCLID OVERSIGHT.
DONT BE FOOLED BY THE THREAT OF SAFETY FORCE LAYOFFS WHILE THE ADMINISTRATION INCREASES IN SIZE AND SALARIES. PLEASE CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING LINK FOR INFORMATION ON THE LAND AQUISITION TAX SCHEME, ALSO KNOWN AS ISSUE 65 - SAFETY LEVY:
Whichever stance a person ultimately takes on traffic enforcement cameras is irrelevant when assessing the city Administration and Council’s handling of the issue.
Are YOU convinced the motivation for traffic enforcement cameras is for safety purposes?
The video below reflects commentary from March 2009 regarding a proposed $15,000 raise for the South Euclid Community Center Director. There was much controversy surrounding the outrageous pay increase in the midst of an economic meltdown. City officials ferociously defended their decision. Councilperson Ruth Gray was perhaps the strongest vocal proponent of the hefty pay raise. She defended the proposed increase by alleging gender based discrimination. It is interesting that Ruth Gray is the Director of Community Life for the City of Bedford Heights. In South Euclid, the Community Center Director is essentially the same position with a slightly different title, minus the responsibilities of a recreation center.
Who will answer the questions surrounding the suspicious circumstances of the Greenvale 9? First; the ill-fated decision was made, at a time when the housing market was already tanking, to borrow $1.8 million and purchase 9 structurally sound brick duplexes for $1.6 million. Next; the remaining $200,000 was used to demolish the homes, instantly reducing them to vacant land. Now; the taxpayers continue to pay debt service with no possibility of ever recouping that money. Public money spent on this venture is at $2 million and climbing.
In the video below are some notable items:
Jane Goodman, Ward 4 Councilperson is the only city official who was willing to admit responsibility and financial defeat.
Ed Gallagher, S.E. Director of Public Service/Economic Development responds when questioned on financial fallout of the Greenvale 9 purchase, “I can’t answer that question.” His 2010 salary is estimated in excess of $80,000.
Joe Filippo, S.E. Finance Director slated to earn $92,106 in 2010 doesn’t offer much to the conversation during public financing discussions.
Community Services Director, Keith Benjamin is the only city official who steps up with a thinly veiled attempt to paint the picture as rosy.
time: 4 min. 08 sec.
PLEASE DON'T MISS THESE RELATED VIDEOS AND PHOTOGRAPHS REGARDING THE GREENVALE 9:
CEDAR CENTER -The documents below reflect information "...related to the repayment of the bond issued to pay for improvements to the Stanhope parking lot. This bond will be totally repaid in 2014."
Let's see if we got this straight...the city borrowed money to do construction at the Stanhope parking lot...(Stanhope = code for Cedar Center project)...those "improvements" were demolished with the rest of Cedar Center...the taxpayers are going to continue to pay for those "improvements" made at Cedar Center until the year 2014...is that right?
How much money was borrowed to make the improvements, and in what year did that occur?
YOUR COMMENTS ARE WELCOME AND ENCOURAGED! ** NEW INFORMATION IS FREQUENTLY POSTED **
You can elect to have your comments and identity remain completely anonymous. Please feel free to address any issue.
Simply click on the words "Post a Comment" or "comments" under any specific posting. If you would like to read the comments that others have made – click on the "title" of the particular "post" that appears as a "headline". All the comments for that post will appear in an easy-to-read format. Then, use your "back" arrow to return to the main blog.
Remember – if you decide to make a comment, your identity will remain completely anonymous, even to those at South Euclid Oversight, if you so desire. Simply select the "anonymous" option when submitting your comment. Your comment is delivered to SEO via a no-reply message from "Google". Your email identity and address are not revealed to those at SEO. If you wish to make direct email contact with SEO, here is the address: seoversight@sbcglobal.net
Please be advised that all comments are moderated to prevent any vulgar or inappropriate statements.
Thank you for your continualinterest and participation!